According to John Palfrey, faculty co-director of the Berkman Center, during Kagan’s six years as dean, she supported, and was deeply involved in, the center’s mission and goals.
“She helped recruit faculty and students, was influential in its development, and helped to raise tens of millions of dollars for the center. She was deeply invested in helping promote our research, which focuses on the study of intellectual property and cyber law. She was well-versed on these issues,” Palfrey said.
That could help as the High Court grapples with an increasing number of thorny issues in the digital age, such as a case heard earlier this spring that could determine whether public employees have a right to privacy in communications sent and received via a work-issued cell phone.
As Harvard Law School dean, Kagan, with the support of other school deans, said the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” rule on gay members of the military violated the schools’ antidiscrimination policies. However, the Supreme Court rejected the argument unanimously, upholding a federal law denying federal funds to schools that blocked the military recruiters.
Last year Kagan returned to Washington as solicitor general (again, the first woman to be appointed to this position), the lawyer who represents the government before the Supreme Court. Kagan defended bipartisan campaign finance reform against special interests seeking to spend unlimited money to influence elections, and while the Supreme Court struck this down, “Elena still chose it as her very first case to argue before the court,” said Obama. “…I think that says a great deal not just about Elena’s tenacity, but about her commitment to serving the American people.”
The Supreme Court did, however, grant Kagan a success by allowing congressional efforts to maintain a cross that has stood for years in California’s Mojave National Preserve.
Too inexperienced?
Though Kagan has never served as a judge, ruled on a case, or written an opinion, supporters say she is more than qualified and is one of the “foremost legal scholars in the country,” said White House senior adviser David Axelrod to FOX News.
“If there was any concern about her not having been a judge, to some extent that will be undercut by her having been solicitor general, which is often talked about as the ‘10th justice,’” said Robert Bennett, law professor at Northwestern University. “She’s not only an advocate before the Supreme Court, but she’s also a confidante of the Supreme Court.”
Also, Kagan wouldn’t be the first non-judge appointed to the Supreme Court—both the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Lewis Powell Jr. were confirmed to the court in 1972 without a judicial background.
“The fact that she has so much practical experience, on a court where it is missing, should be considered an asset,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Judiciary Committee member. “She has a long record as a consensus builder and is the kind of person who can bridge the 5-4 splits that have become so routine on this court.”
While many senators agree with Schumer, some senators are more hesitant about the nomination.
“Her previous confirmation, and my support for her in that position [as solicitor general], do not by themselves establish either her qualifications for the Supreme Court or my obligation to support her,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, Judiciary Committee member. “I have an open mind and look forward to actively participating in the confirmation process.”
“She has been nominated for a lifetime appointment on the nation’s highest court, and we will carefully review her brief litigation experience, as well as her judgment and her career in academia, both as a professor and as an administrator,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
If confirmed for the seat, Kagan will be the fourth woman ever confirmed to the Supreme Court and the third woman among the current justices.
“…Through most of my professional life, I’ve had the simple joy of teaching, of trying to communicate to students why I so loved the law: Not just because it’s challenging and endlessly interesting, although it certainly is that, but because law matters, because it keeps us safe, because it protects our most fundamental rights and freedoms, and because it is the foundation of our democracy,” Kagan said.
Links:
- 25 education trends for 2018 - January 1, 2018
- IT #1: 6 essential technologies on the higher ed horizon - December 27, 2017
- #3: 3 big ways today’s college students are different from just a decade ago - December 27, 2017
Comments are closed.