Research into higher-ed trends reveals changing definitions of success in higher education towards student well-being, career preparation.

Is your institution tracking these 6 global trends?


Research reveals changing definitions of success in higher education towards student well-being, career preparation

Six global higher-ed trends outlined in a new annual research report offer insight into how the pandemic has impacted higher education–and equity, engagement, and intention design are among the top trends.

The report, State of Student Success and Engagement in Higher Education, comes from Instructure, the makers of Canvas.

Overall, about half of respondents report a positive perception of online learning. Mental health is increasingly critical, with 92% viewing student psychological well-being as an impactful socioeconomic factor influencing student success. For North American respondents, skills-based learning emerged as a priority in year-two of the COVID crisis, with 70% of respondents saying that having definable skills is more important than course titles or a degree. 

“This past year as campuses around the world grappled to find a new normal in an increasingly hybrid ecosystem, the number one thing we saw was resilience,” said Melissa Loble, chief customer success officer at Instructure. “While grades remain important, administrators, faculty, and students are defining success more holistically and adjusting campus support to match that definition. Institutions are also actively working to improve faculty technology proficiency and online course development to help students succeed in any environment.”

Now in its second year, Instructure’s research reflects a survey of thousands of current students, administrators, and faculty from 18 countries representing a mixture of two-year, four-year, public, and private higher education institutions. The report uncovered six key trends:

1. Career readiness is (still) the number one priority for students.
Preparing students for life after graduation is the #1 concern, however, administrators and students agree that this is where institutions struggle most.

  • 84% of this year’s respondents defined student success as work/career readiness, a rise from 78% in 2020
  • 35% of students and 33% of administrators globally rank career readiness as the area most needing improvement, 4% more than in 2020

2. Institutions need to think beyond the lecture.
While students still primarily define “success” as academic achievement, faculty and administrators are looking for ways to support the whole student, with psychological well-being and access to mental health positively impacting student engagement. 

  • 50% of institutions surveyed in 2021 offer in-person or virtual counseling services, 33% hold campus well-being events and 24% utilize mental health apps
  • Compared to last year, 2021 respondents were more likely to agree that student success is much more than grades or marks, 80% vs. 75%

3. Faculty-student engagement is critical—whether in person or through technology.
Student success today requires availability of technology resources, as well as engaging content and instruction from technology-proficient faculty.

  • The top four academic factors driving student success cited by both students and administrators are quality of faculty (91%), engaging content/instruction (90%), and available technology and hands-on instruction (both 89%)
  • 71% of all respondents felt the institution’s Learning Management System (LMS) positively impacts student engagement in classes and lectures

4. Online learning needs to be intentionally designed.
As future uncertainty remains and hybrid learning becomes the new norm, creating meaningful, interactive experiences between faculty and students, and connecting students with one another will be critical for hybrid and remote courses alike.

  • For students in 2021, the preference for online learning decreased slightly from last year (50% vs. 47%), as did a positive opinion toward online learning (50% vs. 46%)
  • NORAM faculty are most likely to have access to professional development opportunities for new technology training, at 60%

5. Socioeconomic disparities impact engagement.
Levels of income and access to learning resources and technology tools continue to leave some students behind, greatly impacting how engaged students are in their educational experience.

  • 79% of respondents reported that household income has a moderate or major impact on student engagement
  • Only 6% of students from self-identified lower economic homes said it was very easy to stay engaged

6. The democratization of education begins with equitable access.
Internet connectivity is imperative, but access to technology means more than just providing devices and connectivity to students.

  • The top two 2021 socioeconomic factors that drive student success are access to the internet (92%) and psychological well-being (91%)

Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter: Innovations in K12 Education
By submitting your information, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Laura Ascione

Oops! We could not locate your form.