After attending the Technapex’s MOOC Madness event last Monday, I found myself both excited about the potential MOOCs have to expand the reach of higher education, as well as slightly sore about some of the assumptions that were made about online learning, Technapex reports. The main presumption that irked me was the argument that the best learning takes place inside a physical classroom. I understand that the intention behind this position is that personal interaction and collaboration between students will inspire the most creativity and therefore maximize understanding; however, I have issues with the connections made between this interaction and the classroom environment, specifically within higher ed institutions. Most of the material presented in a university course does not necessitate a physical classroom, and is even observed to be the less-preferred option among students. The connection between comprehensive learning and a typical classroom environment was that presented and supported by the panel; however, my own personal experiences as a student have led to my support of a very contrary stance. ... I find that the majority of the time I spend in class (the time spent in lecture) is less of a wholesome and enriching environment filled with collaboration and idea-swapping and rather more a big hollow room where I sit for 50-minute time slots and someone shares his or her own thoughts and opinions.
Read more
More News from eCampus News
Migrating from on-prem mailboxes to the cloud in higher education
As higher education continues its digital evolution, more colleges and universities are turning to cloud-based applications. These modern solutions offer advantages that on-premise systems can’t match.
Students are unsure about higher ed’s value, but strongly support AI
American students are questioning whether higher education is the path to a successful career–but it remains evident that students believe AI is beneficial to learning.
Data shows growing GenAI adoption in higher ed
Nearly half of HED instructors (45 percent) have positive perceptions about GenAI, despite concerns and perceived risks in its adoption, according to updated data from Cengage Group’s “AI in Education” research series.
College claim to deliver value, but struggle to track its delivery
Although nearly 75 percent of colleges and universities believe their value proposition is clear, less than 10 percent of schools say they have built a reliable tracking process to ensure their perceived value is actually delivered.
Academic freedom under siege: A Ph.D. student’s reflections
As a doctoral student currently engaged in scholarly research within a U.S. higher education institution, I find myself increasingly alarmed by recent developments that suggest an erosion of academic freedom and civil liberties.
4 student mindsets that rationalize cheating
Understanding how students justify cheating can help faculty address the root causes. This article covers common student mindsets that rationalize cheating and offers practical ways to address them before they grow into a cheating culture.
The hidden cost of legacy systems in higher ed
As universities shape the future and prepare the next generation of leaders and innovators, it’s more important than ever to lead in adopting cutting-edge technology and digital transformation.
Take a peek at a new agentic AI virtual teaching assistant
An advanced Virtual Teaching Assistant (TA) pilot program–featuring an AI agent built with Google AI technologies–designed to transform higher education learning for students and empower educators with valuable insights.
How instructor feedback helps students learn academic expectations
Consider the following scenario when giving student feedback. Dr. Walker has read hundreds of student comments over the years, but this one made her think a bit more about her feedback.
6 steps for a successful microcredential program
Microcredentials have gained significant traction in higher education as institutions seek to diversify their offerings and meet the needs of both students and employers.