Today’s universities measure student learning outcomes (SLOs) through in-class assessments targeting the micro and macro level of a learner’s knowledge acquisition.
At the micro level, these assessments take the form of quizzes, mid-term and final exams, and evaluations of assignments submitted by students. At the macro level, SLOs feed into what administrators expect every student, regardless of specific curriculum, program, or major, to master in order to graduate. These are not skills-specific necessarily; they are ideals. These are the outcomes that students should be able “to know, think, or do across all courses” by the time they graduate.
Related content: Big data, used properly, can drive student success
The success or failure of a university’s macro-level SLOs is later assessed (voluntarily) during the accreditation process via one of the nation’s six regional accreditors. This assessment is something that the vast majority of the colleges and universities in the United States undertake currently to earn and maintain campus-wide accreditation.
Troy Markowitz serves as Sr. Director of Business Development at Instructure. He was previously the Vice President of Academic Partnerships at Portfolium, acquired by Instructure in 2019. The Portfolium Network is a space where students can showcase their achievements to potential employers and connect with other Folio users. Troy has over a decade of experience in senior leadership positions at technology and consulting firms such as McKinsey, BDO, and EMC and currently is a contributor to Forbes, among others, writing primarily about the gap between education and the workforce.
- College was the default answer, but the data says it’s time to ask better questions - October 26, 2026
- The most advantaged students attend the best-funded colleges. Does it have to be this way? - October 23, 2026
- Here’s what happens when colleges make the SAT optional - October 19, 2026