One- third of all federal STEM programs had obligations of $1 million or less.
Very few of the federal government’s 209 programs designed to increase knowledge of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) receive oversight from a specific agency, while many STEM initiatives overlap with each other, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Eight in 10 STEM-related programs identified in the extensive GAO report released April 10 had at least some overlap with similar efforts to promote the four academic fields that have been pushed by legislators, policymakers, and educators as a way to fill tech-related jobs during the economic recovery.
Read more about STEM in higher education…
Top universities will help train STEM teachers
Should colleges be judged by job success?
President Obama announced in March that a group of elite universities – including Harvard and Stanford – would join a White House effort to train and deploy 100,000 STEM teachers by 2022, a program partly funded by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Before changes are made to the government’s efforts to promote STEM fields, the GAO cautioned that even among the overlapping initiatives, “services they provide and the populations they serve may differ in meaningful ways and would therefore not necessarily be duplicative.”
Every program under the $3-billion federal STEM umbrella “need[s] to be well coordinated and guided by a robust strategic plan,” no matter its function or overlap with similar programs, the GAO said.
The agency’s investigation into the government’s STEM funding found a distinct lack of evaluation tools that could help officials better understand how to efficiently and effectively promote the four fields.
“Agencies’ limited use of performance measures and evaluations may hamper their ability to assess the effectiveness of their individual programs as well as the overall STEM education effort,” the report said. “Specifically, program officials varied in their ability to provide reliable output measures–for example, the number of students, teachers, or institutions directly served by their program.”
The majority of STEM-related programs throughout the federal government did not conduct comprehensive evaluations since the GAO last took a close look at the various STEM programs in 2005, according to the report.
The GAO credited the Obama administration for naming nationwide STEM education a “crosscutting goal,” but warned that “it will be important to finalize a governmentwide strategic plan so agencies can better align their performance plans and reports to new governmentwide goals.”
Nationwide studies have shown that about two-thirds of STEM educators leave the field within five years due to job dissatisfaction.