Senators go after ‘worthless’ college degrees

By Dennis Carter, Assistant Editor
August 14th, 2012

Half of students who defaulted on their loans say they shouldn’t have to pay them back.

Three Democratic senators, including the chamber’s foremost critic of for-profit colleges, are sponsoring a bill that would bar federal student aid from being used in college programs that lack state licensing, even if the school has institutional accreditation.

Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) this month joined Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) and Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) in introducing the Protecting Students from Worthless Degrees Act, a law that would effectively eliminate a loophole that has allowed many colleges with programs that don’t have local licensing to reap the benefits of billions in federally-backed student loans.

Many for-profit colleges, with some of the nation’s most expansive online course offerings, attain regional and national accreditation but offer unlicensed courses and programs. Even if a student graduates with degrees from these unlicensed programs, local employers are hesitant to hire them.

Last month, former students from the for-profit Virginia College brought a lawsuit against the school because they claim the college was not upfront about licensing of its nursing program.

“Higher education should be a path to the American Dream, but that dream is shattered if when students graduate, they find that their degrees are worthless,” Merkley said. “A college that claims to prepare a student for a specific job should have the accreditation needed so that those degrees are actually worth something in the job market. It’s common sense to say that taxpayers have no place funding programs that hurt students more than they help.”

The bill would require colleges and universities to offer programs that comply with local established accreditation and licensing requirements, so that when a student leaves school, she won’t be at risk of lacking credentials for a local job.

Merkley said that once students realize their degrees won’t help them land a job after college, they go into deeper student debt and take out more loans to earn a properly-certified degree.

“It simply does not make sense for students to waste their federal financial aid and for veterans to use their hard-earned education benefits to attend a school that offers worthless degrees,” said Harkin, who recently released a report excoriating for-profit schools for a range of operational practices. “Most Americans would be outraged to learn that their tax dollars are going to education programs that do not meet the basic requirements needed for their graduates to enter their chosen profession.”

The bill could be considered by members of the Senate’s Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, which Harkin chairs.

The proposed legislation has received broad support from veterans groups in recent weeks, since for-profit colleges with questionable licensing have often targeted service members with GI Bill benefits. The Military Officers Association of America, the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA), and the Student Veterans of America are among the veteran proponents who have backed the bill.

1 2 Read More »

2 Responses to “Senators go after ‘worthless’ college degrees”

One thing that seems to be lacking in this issue is that it’s the students’ responsibility to check out their university prior to their enrollment. There are several ways of verifying accreditation and of finding out whether or not the university’s programs provide the required training / education for employment after graduation.

I agree that many of these schools are playing a dirty game of trying to trick people into enrolling, but ultimately, the student is the one who decides to enroll. There must be some responsibility laid upon their shoulders as well.

August 21, 2012

I laud this legislation. I think it’s a disgrace that for-profit corporations are able to shill expensive and worthless degrees.

Regarding edosan, I hear this a lot that students should accept responsibility. I think we need to keep in mind a few things: 1) some of these applicants are 18, 19, 20 years old. Most of us at that age are not particularly savvy. 2) many (myself included) learn critical thinking skills not in the U.S. elementary or high school system but in the baccalaureate curriculum. the students that for-profits prey on are those students that have not yet had the benefit of the critical thinking and research skills that might actually protect them. and 3) these schools (correctly) shill that they are “accredited.” And they are–in the most basic sense. They just don’t explain the incredibly complicated patchwork of different kinds of accreditation that exist (see: and how certain professions require certain specifics kinds of programs be accredited by specialized agencies or how certain kinds of jobs require degrees from state accrediting agencies.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.