“While the pandemic has significantly disrupted college and university operations, the resilience and focus on student well-being that institutions have demonstrated over the past several months is encouraging,” says Dave Jarrat, senior vice president for strategic engagement at InsideTrack. “The findings of our survey highlight how institutional leaders are planning to direct resources as they seek to recover from the pandemic’s initial impacts on student success.”

This survey is part of InsideTrack’s ongoing efforts to provide higher education leaders and other stakeholders with unique and actionable insights on critical student success topics. The data is rooted in the direct experience of senior administrators managing student-facing functions, including student affairs, academic affairs, enrollment management and admissions.

Despite the rapid growth in working adult, online, and part-time learners over the last decade and the high numbers of these post-traditional students expected to pursue further higher education in an economic recession, most institutional leaders indicated they are much more likely to focus on enrolling traditional-aged, first-time, full-time residential students.

Among leaders at 4-year public institutions, 42 percent listed enrollment of so called “traditional” students among their top three priorities versus 15 percent listing enrollment of post-traditional students. At 4-year private institutions and 2-year public institutions, the results were 62 percent versus 16 percent and 34 percent versus 32 percent, respectively.

With institutions facing uncertain enrollments and budget shortfalls, leaders expect similar to lower budgets across most student success areas. They also expect to address their student success concerns through training and development of existing staff, as opposed to hiring new staff or contracting with outside services providers.

There are several areas where a significant number of administrators are optimistic about having additional financial resources, including student financial aid (53 percent), mental health/counseling services (38 percent) online/hybrid program development (34 percent) and closing equity/achievement gaps (26 percent). Respondents said they are most likely to leverage outside services providers to support mental health/counseling services (31 percent).

Although the top level results were fairly consistent across institution types and sizes, there were some distinctions, including:

Student retention is a top priority for higher-ed leaders

1. 4-year private institutions collectively rated enrolling more first-time students (62 percent) as their second highest priority, ahead of offering more online/hybrid courses (46 percent).

2. 2-year public institutions collectively rated retaining current students (73 percent) and offering more online/hybrid courses (71 percent) almost equally.

3. Larger institutions (27 percent) were three times more likely than smaller institutions (7 percent) to rate re-enrollment of students who had stopped/dropped out as a top priority.

4. Smaller institutions are more likely to enlist the support of outside service providers, except in the area of offering more online/hybrid courses, where mid-sized institutions (27 percent) are more than five times as likely as smaller and larger institutions (5 percent each) to seek outside support.

Material from a press release was used in this report.

Want to share a great resource? Let us know at submissions@eschoolmedia.com.

About the Author:

Laura Ascione

Laura Ascione is the Managing Editor, Content Services at eSchool Media. She is a graduate of the University of Maryland's prestigious Philip Merrill College of Journalism. Find Laura on Twitter: @eSN_Laura


Add your opinion to the discussion.