learning differences

Learning Differences MOOC might help educators target instruction

Educators are constantly challenged to meet diverse learning needs, report notes

Despite their passion for teaching and commitment to the field, educators around the world – with varying years of experience, teaching different subjects, at different levels, in a variety of contexts – are continually challenged to meet the diverse learning needs of their students.

A new report suggests that the Learning Differences Massive Open Online Course for Educators (MOOC-Ed), provided by the Friday Institute for Education Innovation at NC State University, may help teachers around the world advance their knowledge of learning differences and better meet the learning needs of their students.

Written by researchers on the Friday Institute’s evaluation team, What’s the Value of a Learning Differences MOOC-Ed? analyzes how participants found value in the course using a “value creation framework” developed by Etienne Wenger, Beverly Trayner, and Maarten De Laat (2011). They suggest that, in order to appreciate the richness of the value created by learning communities or networks such as MOOC-Eds, it is helpful to think about value creation in terms of cycles.

The authors, Dr. Sherry Booth and Suzanne Branon, found that much of the feedback they received from Learning Differences participants aligned with the framework’s five cycles, which are:

1. Immediate value: activities and interactions that produce value in and of themselves, such as sharing stories, tips and ideas, posing interesting questions, making connections, or participating in collective reflection.

2. Potential value: activities and interactions that produce various forms of knowledge capital that have the potential to be realized later. Various types of knowledge capital – human capital, social capital, tangible capital, and learning capital – produced through members’ participation were clearly discernible in the data collected from MOOC-Ed participants.

3. Applied value: participants use what they learned to change their practice. When asked on end-of-course surveys if they had attempted to make changes in their professional practice as a result of participation in the MOOC-Ed, 97 percent of educators answered “yes.”

4. Realized value: what participants learn results in performance improvements of varying types. Examining realized value – actual improved performance – is especially relevant here as the long-term goal or outcome for the creators and funders of the Learning Differences MOOC-Ed is to help all students achieve success in K-12 educational settings. In particular, educators noted positive outcomes with students.

5. Reframing value: when shifts in perspective and practice lead to positive outcomes, learners may experience a profound reconsideration of strategies, goals, and even values. These redefinitions and major shifts can occur at the individual, collective, and even organizational levels.

Despite criticisms of the traditional MOOC framework, these promising findings suggest that the Friday Institute’s innovative use of MOOCs for professional development hold potential for helping educators advance their expertise and improve professional practice.

The report was prepared for the Oak Foundation, which provided funding for the Learning Differences MOOC-Ed. Click here to read the full report.

Laura Ascione