design-spaces-campus

Has online learning made the lecture hall obsolete?


Educators debate whether online education can really replace face-to-face learning

lecturehallresizedCollege by radio was a failure. College by television was a failure. Now, college by internet. Will it be different this time?

That’s the question ABC News’ John Donvan posed to four education experts Wednesday during an Intelligence Squared debate at Columbia University set around the motion “More Clicks, Few Bricks: The Lecture Hall is Obsolete.”

While the motion is certainly a divisive one, none of the four debaters were actually arguing completely for or against online learning. Rather, as Donvan admitted, it was an argument about emphasis. Participating in the debate were four educators whose emphasis could be easily surmised before they took the stage.

For the motion: Anant Agarwal, CEO of massive open online course (MOOC) platform edX, and Ben Neslon, CEO of the Minerva Project.

Against the motion: Jonathan Cole, former provost at Columbia University, and Rebecca Schuman, a columnist for the Chronicle of Higher Education and Slate who gleefully wrote about Sebastian Thrun admitting Udacity MOOCs are often a “lousy product.”

Thrun’s revelation, and his company’s pivot toward vocational training, was brought up early in the night’s discussion. Online learning, particularly MOOCs, are not reaching the audience they were intended to reach, Cole said.

He presented several questions he believed MOOC proponents had yet to answer. What is the cost model? How will intellectual property be divided up? How do you really know what kinds of students you are reaching?

Cole also took issue with the way online learning prevents the sort of personal, physical interaction that takes place on college campuses.

“People learn from each other when they eat together, read together, converse together, sleep together,” he said.

Schuman, too, said online learning means less human contact. She related two stories about students from her own classroom, stories she said couldn’t be replicated in a MOOC.

Her brilliant student with dyslexia may not appear brilliant when assessed by a robot or professor who has never conversed with her in reality. Her student who overcame a debilitating shyness through class presentations could never do that by typing in an online forum.

Schuman took a moment to list every student in the course by name.

“People,” she said. “Real people. I know them. They know me. We connect.”

Nelson said Cole and Schuman were missing the potential of online learning by focusing just on MOOCs, though he is a supporter of the courses. The Minerva Project uses small classes with direct contact through webcams to a dozen students at once, for example.

“Their argument is a critique of a small segment of online education now, as it stands,” Nelson said. “It was not a critique of the potential. What we all have to remember is that we are at the dawn of high quality, interactive online education.”

Argawal echoed Nelson, saying that the debate is not simply about MOOCs, particularly MOOCs in their current form, but about where online learning will go in the future. He also pushed back against statistics commonly used to discredit MOOCs, like low retention rates and the small percentage of students taking the courses who don’t already have a degree.

Even if only ten percent of students passed Argawal’s first MOOC, that is still 7,000 students — more, he said, than he could teach in 40 years. And while only a fraction of edX’s millions of users are without a degree, 600,000 of the students are high schoolers or undergraduates, a number larger than even the most expansive university.

“MOOCs are two years old,” he said. “There’s no comparing it to an education system that has been around for 1,000 years and has failed.”

A vote from the audience anointed Argawal and Nelson as the debate’s winners. While only 18 percent of the crowd agreed with them at the debate’s start, 44 percent agreed by the end. Cole and Schuman still had the majority of the crowd’s support, however, with 47 percent of the vote.

Watch the entire debate here.

Follow Jake New on Twitter at @eCN_Jake.

 

Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter: Innovations in K12 Education
By submitting your information, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Latest posts by Jake New (see all)

Comments are closed.

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Sign up for our newsletter

Newsletter: Innovations in K12 Education
By submitting your information, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.