The for-profit college industry, featuring some of the most expansive online learning programs in the United States, was the only higher-education sector that saw a drop in employment last year despite massive growth over the past decade, according to newly-released federal statistics.
The U.S. Education Department’s National Center for Education Statistics on Sept. 25 released its latest higher-education employment numbers, showing that colleges and universities have slowed hiring to rates not seen since 2003.
For-profit colleges, mostly catering to nontraditional learners who earn degrees and credentials online, were the only schools to end 2011 with fewer employees than they started with. The number of for-profit college employees dropped to 288,890 in fall 2011 from 295,495 in 2010, according to the federal report.
For more information on higher-education job opportunities, read about the partnership between eCampus News and HigherEdJobs.
However, the number of for-profit college executives and managers ticked up slightly in 2011.
Ashford University, among the most prominent for-profit institutions, announced just this week that 450 student recruiters were laid off so the school could better focus on “student success.” Ashford is owned by Bridgepoint Education, which has been under intense federal scrutiny for its recruitment practices over the past two years.
Higher education employed 3,920,836 people in 2011, up from around 3.9 million in 2010, according to the report. That’s the lowest rate of growth in eight years.
The department’s thorough rundown of college employment and student aid also showed that for-profit colleges cost students much more than public institutions, on average—though not as much as private nonprofit schools. Students attending public four-year universities paid an average of $17,600 per year, before student aid was accounted for. At for-profits, students paid an average of $27,900 before aid was incorporated.
College students at private, nonprofit four-year institutions paid an average of $34,000 a year.
For-profit colleges have long been criticized for taking in a disproportionate amount of federally backed student aid while maintaining high student dropout and loan default rates. For-profit industry officials have argued that skyrocketing dropout and default rates are to be expected in a sector that serves low-income, nontraditional students.
Jeremy Dehn, a former professor at the Art Institute of Colorado, said that argument would be more persuasive if for-profit schools weren’t so expensive.