The Obama administration is calling for an overhaul of college programs that prepare new teachers, saying they are cash cows that do a mediocre job of preparing teachers for the classroom. Among the changes proposed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan: overhauling education schools’ curricula to ensure that future teachers learn how to use data to improve their instruction, and linking the performance of teachers with the schools where they received their training, so policy makers can see which schools are most effective.
In a speech delivered to Columbia University’s Teachers College on Oct. 22, Duncan called for “revolutionary change” in schools of education, which prepare at least 80 percent of the nation’s teachers.
Duncan said he has talked to hundreds of great young teachers while serving as Chicago schools chief and later as President Barack Obama’s schools chief. The teachers have two complaints about education schools, he said.
“First, most of them say they did not get the hands-on teacher training about managing the classroom that they needed, especially for high-needs students,” he said in his speech.
“And second, they say there were not taught how to use data to improve instruction and boost student learning,” Duncan said.
A 2006 report found that three out of five education school alumni said their training failed to prepare them to teach, he noted. The report was by Arthur Levine, a former Teachers College president.
Their large enrollment and low overhead makes education schools cash cows for their universities, Duncan said. But their profits have been diverted to smaller, more prestigious graduate departments such as physics and have not been spent on research and training for would-be teachers, he said.
Duncan tempered his criticism by noting that states, districts, and the federal government also are to blame for the problems.
“Most states routinely approve teacher education programs, and licensing exams typically measure basic skills and subject matter knowledge with paper-and-pencil tests without any real-world assessment of classroom readiness,” he said. “Local mentoring programs for new teachers are poorly funded and often poorly organized at the district level.”
And the federal government has been slow to provide guidance on the key ideas and concepts to be mastered at each grade level.
What’s more, most states and school districts don’t link the performance of teachers to their education schools to identify which programs prepare their teachers and which don’t, Duncan said.
“We should be studying and copying the practices of effective teacher preparation programs, and encouraging the lowest-performers to shape up or shut down,” he said.
Duncan also acknowledged some of the reforms that are under way in education schools, such as teacher residency programs modeled after the medical profession. The U.S. Department of Education (ED) recently announced $43 million in grants for 28 Teacher Quality Partnership programs that went to colleges of education and high-need school districts, with more than half of the five-year grants supporting residency programs, he said. An additional $100 million in grants included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will be awarded early next year.
- Top trends: Improve graduation rates and retention - August 8, 2019
- Learn how this university adopted a successful data-driven strategy for inclusive learning - June 17, 2019
- Stunning: 56 percent of institutions will struggle to meet recruitment targets due to visa, travel restrictions - September 29, 2017