Technology, often associated with helping to make life easier and more accessible, isn’t always as usable for some as others, accessibility researchers say. And with Google Apps quickly becoming a go-to solution for schools and colleges nationwide, it’s critical to know exactly how accessible these apps are for students with disabilities.
The Access Technology Higher Education Network (ATHEN), a professional association whose purpose is to collect and disseminate best practices in accessible technology for colleges and universities, has performed a number of functional tests on various Google applications, including Google Docs, GMail, and Calendar.
And though researcher and technology accessibility specialist Terrill Thompson at the University of Washington says that many improvements have been made, these efforts largely have targeted screen reader users and have not considered people with other types of disabilities.
ATHEN’s tests show that many people with disabilities are “currently unable to successfully use these applications, and the level of support for assistive technologies ranged from being able to perform many, but not all, of the functions to not being able to use the applications at all,” Thompson said during the EDUCAUSE 2012 conference in Denver last week.
Disability types tested in the reports included visual (via screen readers, screen magnification, and high-contrast mode), mobility (keyboard-only access and speech recognition software), and cognitive (literacy software).
Each assistive technology then was graded (A-F) on how well it functioned with Google Docs, GMail, and Calendar.
According to the report on Google Docs, published in October 2011, some of the major problems include:
- Speech recognition software users cannot dictate text into, or interact with, the application.
- Keyboard-only users often cannot access the app menu, and thus, much of the functionality of the app.
- High-contrast users can’t see many of the toolbar buttons and other user interface elements.
- Screen reader users can’t always interact with the app reliably and effectively, reach and perform the desired functions, or determine what is being asked in “pop-up” windows.
According to the report on GMail and Calendar, published in February 2012, while there were several positive findings for users with certain types of disabilities, including users of screen magnification software, keyboard-only interactions, and some high-contrast visual layouts, there still were “significant shortcomings, especially for screen reader users,” such as: